Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]

To: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>
Cc: "J.A. Bezemer" <costar@panic.et.tudelft.nl>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-cd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:14:09 -0700 (MST)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1001218171341.13376F-100000@wakko.deltatee.com>
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1001218235114.4902A-100000@stephen>

On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Philip Charles wrote:

> I have a question about the pool.  Where are the new Packages files (or
> their equivelent) going to be placed?  This is something I have yet to
> discover.  Thanks.

In exactly the same place as the old ones, so that URL comptibiltity is
retained.

JAson

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]
  - From: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>

References:
- Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]
  - From: Philip Charles <philipc@copyleft.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]
Next by Date: Building 2.2r2 CDs
Previous by thread: Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]
Next by thread: Re: Package organization on CDs [was Re: Packages files references packages in pool instead of binary-... location]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread