Re: Can't md5-check 2.2_rev0/binary-i386-2.iso
On 24-Aug-2000 J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> On Wed, 23 Aug 2000, Jim Westveer wrote:
>
>> On 24-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
>> > On 23-Aug-2000 Jim Westveer wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Being myself, a fan of double negatives....does this mean
>> >> that the i386 CD#2 image HAS been patched ???
>
> The image on cdimage.d.o has been patched, but it usually takes several days
> for mirrors to pick up (mirroring from other mirrors etc.)
Because the errors were mentioned on DWN, we should make sure
that joey knows knows of the changes.
>
>> > But, it seems I answer my own question
<snip>
>> Or perhaps 2.2_rev0 + 'a little bit'
>
>> Actually, I was always taught, that when one changes
>> a software product, one changes the revision number.
>
> For correcting a single typo, publishers don't call it a "second, revised
> edition".
Actually Publishers (print) will call it a second printing.
Appologies for prolonging the thread. Just want to make
sure that it is common knowledge that the "errors" were
"corrected"
Ciao,
--
Jim Westveer <jwest@netnw.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with sendmail.cf.
"It never does quite what I want."
"I wish Christopher Robin were here.".
------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: jwest@netnw.com jwest@debian.org
work : 425-591-3002 Date: 24-Aug-2000
home 425-392-0141 Time: 07:44:45
pgp-key 0x36129171 gpg-key 0x9823336C
------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: