Re: cvs and debian-cd
On Thu, 15 Jun 2000, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Le Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 04:44:05PM +0100, Philip Hands écrivait:
> > It was mentioned in someone else's mail to the list, and seemed like a
> > good plan. I'm of the opinion that trying it in a test cycle is the
> > quickest way of finding out if people are going to get stressed about
> > whatever it is that drops off the end of the CD as a result.
> > I'd hope that some sort of consensus will emerge by release time, so
> > that the hate mail about package XYZ not being on CD#1 doesn't all come
> > to me.
> As soon as you get this consensus, please commit this little change then. :)
I've checked the .list files, and saw that quite a lot has changed on
test-cycle-2 i386 Binary-1. For example, queso is new but rsync is gone.
And several more "weird" things that I can't really explain. However, we
should keep in mind that, besides the addition of the kernel-source package,
also the size-limit was different, and that a number of rc-bugs-packages were
removed. So I don't think that putting kernel-source on Binary-1 will be a