[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: debian-cd stuff and latest commits



On 14-Mar-2000 Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Hi everybody,
<snip> 
Jim, you commited several things just to remove doc directories from the
> CD ? Why did you do that ? I intentionally put the doc on all the CDs as
> it doesn't take that much free space and as it can be quite convenient.
> Even if we decide to remove the doc directories, there's no need to remove it
> from the CD, we just need not to include it... Furthermore, the changes
> you commited don't always work since :
> - rm without -f will interactively ask for removal of read-only files and
>   that's a pity
> - rm without -f will fail if the file doesn't exist and you're trying to
>   remove $BDIR/4/doc which doesn't always exist (only if you build with
>   non-free) and since the scripts uses "set -e" they'll fail ...

True, it should have been rm -f ..

I dont beleive we need to put the /doc directory on ALL the disks.
But I see no problem leaving them there.
 
I must have been thinking of trying to pack more on the 2,3,...disks
and /doc on disks other than #1 seemed redundant at the time.  

Now that I look at the changes to make the i386 disks bootable, I also
included in boot-i386

if [ $N != 1 ]; then 
        echo -n "-J" > $N.mkisofs_opts
        rm -r $CDDIR/doc        #remove doc dir on #2,#3,#4
        exit 0; 

humm, I must have been a vengefull mood about the doc dir...


Thanks,



No problem.


-- 
Jim Westveer <jwest@netnw.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
"Bother," said Pooh as he struggled with sendmail.cf.
"It never does quite what I want."
"I wish Christopher Robin were here.". 
------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: Jim Westveer <jwest@netnw.com>
phone   425-591-3002
fax     425-557-0660                  Date: 14-Mar-2000
URL     lcs.issaquah.wa.us            Time: 12:38:25
Random number = DC 49 E8 7E 76 DD 30 2D 8D F1 B4 D8 A3 60 4C 04
------------------------------------------------------------


Reply to: