Re: The Pseudo-Image Kit v2.0pre2
On Tue, 21 Sep 1999, jason andrade wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 1999, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
>
> > - At the moment I've several binary-i386-1.iso.list files in
> > various directories. But I don't know any more what's r0, r2 or r3.
> > Would it be a big problem to include the version number in the
> > filename of the images, like 21r3-binary-i386-1.iso ?
>
> yes. i'll shoot you if you do :-)
All the way from .au? ;-)
>
> one of the big wins with debian-cd has been if you're rsyncing to update
> cdimages using --partial - all you have to do is change a directory name
> and away you go. it'll be more of a pain to go through every file and
> change all the names before running rsync over them.
Well, my experience with 2.1r0 -> 2.1r2 was that the pseudo-image way
was faster than just rsyncing over the 2.1r0 image. But that might be
different with other updates; i've not (yet?) tried 2.1r2 -> 2.1r3.
And of course I can always rename files myself ;-)
Regards,
Anne Bezemer
Reply to: