Bug#957380: istgt: diff for NMU version 0.4~20111008-3.1
On 12 Aug 2020, at 20:16, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:04 PM Sudip Mukherjee
> <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:54 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12 Aug 2020, at 19:51, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> HI Jess,
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12 Aug 2020, at 19:15, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Control: tags 957380 + patch
>>>>>> Control: tags 957380 + pending
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear maintainer,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've prepared an NMU for istgt (versioned as 0.4~20111008-3.1) and
>>>>>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
>>>>>> should cancel it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, I've been meaning to do this but it's just not a high enough
>>>>> priority for me. Could you please however use `typedef` instead, as I
>>>>> believe the intent of the code (based on how these ones are written,
>>>>> and what's around it) is to have `ISTGT_LU_TASK_TYPE` be the type name,
>>>>> not `enum ISTGT_LU_TASK_TYPE`? Would you also be willing to file it as
>>>>> a merge request against https://salsa.debian.org/bsd-team/istgt?
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/bsd-team/istgt has UNRELEASED changes and the
> version is 0.5~20120901-1 there. But since there is no pristine-tar or
> upstream branch, I am unable to generate
> istgt_0.5~20120901.orig.tar.gz to build and test with the proposed
> patch.
Ah, yes and that 0.5 work looks half-baked. I've created a new 0.5
feature branch for that and rewound master (yes, bad practice, I know,
but I highly doubt anyone else has a clone) to the 0.4~20111008-3
release so you should be good to use it as-is now.
Jess
Reply to: