Bug#957380: istgt: diff for NMU version 0.4~20111008-3.1
On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 8:04 PM Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:54 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 12 Aug 2020, at 19:51, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > HI Jess,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 7:21 PM Jessica Clarke <jrtc27@debian.org> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 12 Aug 2020, at 19:15, Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> Control: tags 957380 + patch
> > >>> Control: tags 957380 + pending
> > >>>
> > >>> Dear maintainer,
> > >>>
> > >>> I've prepared an NMU for istgt (versioned as 0.4~20111008-3.1) and
> > >>> uploaded it to DELAYED/2. Please feel free to tell me if I
> > >>> should cancel it.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks, I've been meaning to do this but it's just not a high enough
> > >> priority for me. Could you please however use `typedef` instead, as I
> > >> believe the intent of the code (based on how these ones are written,
> > >> and what's around it) is to have `ISTGT_LU_TASK_TYPE` be the type name,
> > >> not `enum ISTGT_LU_TASK_TYPE`? Would you also be willing to file it as
> > >> a merge request against https://salsa.debian.org/bsd-team/istgt?
https://salsa.debian.org/bsd-team/istgt has UNRELEASED changes and the
version is 0.5~20120901-1 there. But since there is no pristine-tar or
upstream branch, I am unable to generate
istgt_0.5~20120901.orig.tar.gz to build and test with the proposed
patch.
--
Regards
Sudip
Reply to: