On 25/08/14 23:46, Christoph Egger wrote: > I think it's no problem so far. It's just that the biarch libc-dev thing > is not part on build-essential and therefore not installe don the > buildds (if one doesn't build depend on it). I'd prbably just add a `-I > /usr/include/$triple` at the right place to get things to build for > now -- cleaner than adding a build-depends line -- if I figure out how. But from your sbuild log it (libc0.1-dev-i386) was actually being brought in as a dependency? | Merged Build-Depends: libc6-dev | libc-dev, gcc (>= 4:4.9.1), g++ (>= 4:4.9.1), make, dpkg-dev (>= 1.17.11), libc0.1-dev-i386, debhelper (>= 5.0.0), bzip2, sharutils, flex-old | flex, freebsd-buildutils (>= 10.0-3~), freebsd-glue (>= 0.1.5), byacc, clang-3.4, libdb-dev, libbsd-dev (>= 0.3.0), pkg-config, libsbuf-dev (>= 9.0+ds1-2), kernel-wedge (>= 2.79) Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain steven@pyro.eu.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature