Re: FreeBSD 9.2
On 28/07/13 23:44, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2013/7/18 Steven Chamberlain <steven@pyro.eu.org>:
>> 9.1 probably should not migrate to testing too quickly - I may file a
>> blocking RC bug
>
> Do you still want to file this bug?
I don't see a reason to delay it's migration now. Especially as it is
compiling OK with gcc-4.8. popcon shows 4 users, including me and we've
no bug reports yet.
And I now see two reasons for its migration to happen quickly:
> I wonder if we should wait for 9.1 to migrate before uploading
> 9.2-BETA1 to unstable. If there's trouble ahead for 9.2, waiting a
> long time can miss the opportunity for fixes to make it to
> 9.2-RELEASE.
I would still prefer 9.1 to migrate before 9.2 goes into unstable,
therefore we may want to hurry.
> Well, currently 9.1 is RC-buggy due to security hole, [...]
And 9.0 in testing has the same security issue, which we have a duty to
fix (by allowing a fixed package to migrate).
So I'd prefer to see one more upload of 9.1 to unstable, with the
nfsserver security bugfix, with urgency=medium or high. And it should
be allowed to migrate unless someone finds a serious bug during those
2-5 days.
Does that seem like a reasonable plan?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
steven@pyro.eu.org
Reply to: