[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#644431: theunarchiver: FTBFS(kfreebsd): undefined reference to `reallocf'



Hi!

On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 21:36:16 +0200, Christoph Egger wrote:
> Package: src:theunarchiver
> Version: 2.7.1-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: sid wheezy
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
> Justification: fails to build from source (but built successfully in the past)

> Your package failed to build on the kfreebsd-* buildds:
> 
> make[3]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/UniversalDetector'
> gcc -Wl,--whole-archive -fexceptions -fgnu-runtime -o unar unar.o CSCommandLineParser.o CommandLineCommon.o NSStringPrinting.o libXADMaster.a ../UniversalDetector/libUniversalDetector.a -Wl,--no-whole-archive -lgnustep-base -lcrypto -lbz2 -lz -licuuc -lobjc -lstdc++ -lm
> libXADMaster.a(XADPrefixCode.o): In function `NewNode':
> /build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/XADMaster/XADPrefixCode.m:42: undefined reference to `reallocf'
> /build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/XADMaster/XADPrefixCode.m:42: undefined reference to `reallocf'
> /build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/XADMaster/XADPrefixCode.m:42: undefined reference to `reallocf'
> /build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/XADMaster/XADPrefixCode.m:42: undefined reference to `reallocf'
> /build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/XADMaster/XADPrefixCode.m:42: undefined reference to `reallocf'
> libXADMaster.a(XADSkipHandle.o):/build/buildd-theunarchiver_2.7.1-2-kfreebsd-amd64-xipvuN/theunarchiver-2.7.1/XADMaster/XADSkipHandle.m:137: more undefined references to `reallocf' follow
> collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

I see this has already been fixed, but in any case I wanted to let be
known that libbsd-dev could (have been|be) used instead.

thanks,
guillem


Reply to: