Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 23:02 +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt <email@example.com>:
> > If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
> > push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
> > that the partman-* changes won't be included?
> I didn't know if D-I followed the same release cycle. Given your
> reply, now I assume it does.
d-i _in stable_ does, yes. The only time anything in stable changes is
in a point release. (The udeb packages might get uploaded to
proposed-updates in between, but there's no installer release that would
be built to use them, afaik).