Re: Backporting ZFS installer support to kreebsd
2011/10/1 Adam D. Barratt <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> If you mean in to 6.0.3, is there any particular benefit to trying to
> push that particular update at this late stage in the process, given
> that the partman-* changes won't be included?
I didn't know if D-I followed the same release cycle. Given your
reply, now I assume it does.
> Might it not make more
> sense to look at the remaining changes as a set for 6.0.4?
Sure, we can get back to this later.