Re: [kfreebsd] massive report for uninstallable FUSE packages
Robert Millan <email@example.com> writes:
> There are 23 packages in unstable which can't be installed on Debian
> GNU/kFreeBSD because of their unconditional dependency on fuse-utils.
> On this platform, fuse4bsd should be used instead.
> I indent to file one bug report for each of them:
> wikipediafs sshfs smbnetfs s3ql rofs python-fuse pytagsfs plptools
> mythtvfs ntfsprogs libpam-mount libfuse-perl libconfig-model-perl
> httpfs2 gphotofs gfarm2fs fusedav fts flickrfs curlftpfs bindfs avfs
> using the following template:
> Package: %package%
> Severity: important
> User: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Usertags: kfreebsd
> This package is not installable on kfreebsd-i386 or kfreebsd-amd64 because it
> depends unconditionally on fuse-utils. Please considering adjusting the
> dependency from:
> Depends: fuse-utils
> Depends: fuse-utils [linux-any] | fuse4bsd [kfreebsd-any]
> If it requires fuse-utils specifically because of the command-line functionality
> in that package (and not just to obtain a FUSE daemon), please reply to this
> bug report so we can try to find a solution.
I'm maintaining the s3ql package and it uses the fusermount command. I
am not sure what you mean with "a FUSE daemon"...?
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C