Re: Additional kernel options and devices
2011/2/8 Guillem Jover <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> [...] upstream might not
> have enabled them because they are not deemed ready for wider use,
> for stability, performance, or other reasons.
> A possible solution to this could be to build another kernel image
> flavour with some default diverging options enabled, and once and if
> they have been tested successfully we could consider moving specific
> ones to the main images.
Wouldn't experimental be a better place for this?
Or even, a separate package that tracks -current. Then
it'd accomplish the goal you describe, plus other kind of
testing at the same time. But that possibly requires more