Petr Salinger wrote: >> Regarding 0.5.14 (which I plan to upload soon): Do you want me to enable the new >> usb2 backend (given we get it to compile) or the old usb backend? > > I personally prefer the new one, CC-ing -bsd to get broader opinion. Very well then. I put up preliminary packages of 0.5.14 up at [1]. The should compile successfully on linux and kfreebsd. I would very much appreciate if you ore Aurelien could review the kfreebsd patches (debian/patches/5?-kfreebsd-*.patch). Their patch headers should contain a meaningful description. E.g. in debian/patches/54-kfreebsd-libusb2.patch I only changed the minimum of "#if __FreeBSD_version" to make it compile, but the code contains a lot more #ifdefs which have no distinction for kfreebsd (grep __FreeBSD_version hald -R) and I don't know if they should be updated too. I'm awaiting your response so I can go on with the upload of 0.5.14-1. Thanks, Michael [1] http://debs.michaelbiebl.de/hal/ -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature