[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Parted

severity 559645 grave

On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:22:05AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Aurelien's segfault fix [1] seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it
> > to BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate?  I don't know if
> > GNU/kFreeBSD bugs are considered RC these days...).
> When something is clearly broken and preventing important parts of the
> system to work, I think it deserves serious severity.
> (From an FTBFS point of view, RC if already built once, since it
> prevents migration to testing, important otherwise, as for other
> architectures. For other bugs, I'm not sure there's a strict policy.)

I'm tentatively raising the severity to RC.  If the maintainer disagrees,
well, he can set it back so no harm done.

> #559645 is missing “Usertags: kfreebsd” by the way.

Thanks, I noticed a while ago and I believe it's already fixed.

Robert Millan

  The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
  how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
  still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."

Reply to: