severity 559645 grave
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 02:22:05AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Aurelien's segfault fix  seemed quite obvious, so I submitted it
> > to BTS, bug #559645 (btw, is severity appropiate? I don't know if
> > GNU/kFreeBSD bugs are considered RC these days...).
> When something is clearly broken and preventing important parts of the
> system to work, I think it deserves serious severity.
> (From an FTBFS point of view, RC if already built once, since it
> prevents migration to testing, important otherwise, as for other
> architectures. For other bugs, I'm not sure there's a strict policy.)
I'm tentatively raising the severity to RC. If the maintainer disagrees,
well, he can set it back so no harm done.
> #559645 is missing “Usertags: kfreebsd” by the way.
Thanks, I noticed a while ago and I believe it's already fixed.
The DRM opt-in fallacy: "Your data belongs to us. We will decide when (and
how) you may access your data; but nobody's threatening your freedom: we
still allow you to remove your data and not access it at all."
- From: Robert Millan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Re: Parted
- From: Cyril Brulebois <email@example.com>