I marked the failing packages as follows (as it *seems* to me, after a few seconds glance): - ˙˙Needs porting.˙˙: Might work on GNU/kFreeBSD; - ˙˙Needs porting?˙˙: Might be Linux-specific, or very hard to port. - ˙˙Linux-specific?˙˙: Looks very much like Linux-only, but well˙˙ Depending on what others think, I'll probably start putting packages in Not-for-us (which we can edit anytime), and for packages that really are Linux-only, file bugs for their inclusion in P-a-s.
It looks a right way to go. Cheers Petr