[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

libsigc++: ping on #260256


is there any reason preventing the patch for #260256 to get applied? It
was reported a while back and we haven't been receiving any answer for
1.5+ year. What would you think of a porter NMU? (Since I understand
fully that you might be busy on something else.)

Thanks in advance.


Cyril Brulebois

Attachment: pgpN8rXMLc9sX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: