[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: (wishlist) Re: edos.debian.net


On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 12:00:13AM +0100, Petr Salinger wrote:
> Hi.
> >>>On my side, I would ask edos.debian.net maintainers to add, if not too
> >>>difficult, the kfreebsd-i386 and kfreebsd-amd64 architectures as is
> >>>already the case on packages.debian.org (and, why not, hurd-i386,
> >>>armeb, m32r and other prospective ports).
> >>
> >>With pleasure. Just tell me from where I can get the Package files.
> >
> >I tried to do my best (CCed debian-bsd just in case) in gathering
> >them.
> >
> >kfreebsd-i386
> >http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-kfreebsd-i386/
> >http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/dists/unreleased/main/binary-kfreebsd-i386/
> >
> >kfreebsd-amd64
> >http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/dists/sid/main/binary-kfreebsd-amd64/
> >http://ftp.gnuab.org/debian/dists/unreleased/main/binary-kfreebsd-amd64/

What is "unreleased"? Is it an alias for "experimental"?

> But it might need some changes on your side,
> as we do not have one repository.
> We have in fact three repositories and we need to test union of them:
> sid + unreleased + "arch all packages from i386 sid".

That shouldn't be a problem. The situation is already the same for

Cheers -Ralf.

Reply to: