Robert Millan a écrit :
Well, I am not sure it is the way to do that. If the glibc already provides it, we should update it in the glibc instead of deleting the file in debian/rules of glibc and providing it in kfreebsd-kernel-headers.Package: kfreebsd-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch Hi, This patch adds header protection to kfreebsd's <sys/syscall.h>. Note that this is a dynamicaly-generated file. My patch fixes _both_ the generator script and the header so that the fix is also applied when building header packages. After this is applied, it will be suitable to replace glibc's <sys/syscall.h> (which is just an old version from kfreebsd) with up-to-date version in kfreebsd-kernel-headers.
Ok, nice. However I don't think it is necessary to fix that in our kernel if the bug is fixed in the glibc. After all, the kernel currently build fine.I'm forwarding it to upstream, too.
Bye, Aurelien -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' aurel32@debian.org | aurelien@aurel32.net `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net