On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 10:34:56PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 31, 2004 at 03:11:13PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 11:55:12PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Here are the packages I have so far. Note that this includes things > > > I've built by hand (such as gcc and apt) plus a very few "fake" packages > > > built by equivs (libc, libc6-dev). > > > > Hmmm. The libc12 package (netbsd-libc source) should provide libc. Things > > that have just "libc6-dev" and not "libc6-dev | libc-dev" are almost always > > worthy of having a bug filed... > > You are right, of course. There an unfortunate many packages with this > dependency. It is, in fact, totally unnecessary since libc6-dev is > build-essential anyway. > > I wanted to get things going and too many things were failing because of > that dep. Obviously this will have to come out later. Fair enough, I suppose. If we can, it might be good to throw an obvious warning about these, since they're all guaranteed to be worth of a wishlist bug (since I try to avoid filing anything higher than wishlist for NetBSD stuff, *unless* it's something that worked before, and broke). Occasionally it's a versioned libc6-dev, which is still useful, but needs to be alternatively bound to libc-dev, obviously. As long as the actual Depends that end up used have the libc-12 values, it's not terribly crucial, though. -- Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org> ,''`. Debian GNU/NetBSD(i386) porter : :' : `. `' `-
Attachment:
pgpKs7FBfPrdS.pgp
Description: PGP signature