Re: Sparc port
- To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Sparc port
- From: Matthew Rose <mat@rose.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2003 16:12:37 +0000
- Message-id: <20030207161237.GA7194@rose.org.uk>
- In-reply-to: <20021022214432.GA4416@lightbearer.com>
- References: <20021021170034.GH8334@cahier.elvet> <20021021170742.GB24782@srcf.ucam.org> <20021022153920.GI8334@cahier.elvet> <20021022214432.GA4416@lightbearer.com>
On (22/10/02 15:44), Joel Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 04:39:21PM +0100, John Ineson wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 06:07:42PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Oh, and mentions of patch locations aren't ideal now. Joel's got rather a
> > > lot of cleaner ones in his CVS tree,
> >
> > Where do I find that? I can't see any reference to it in the list
> > archives.
> >
> > At present, dpkg won't build because it can't find obstack.h, which
> > seems to be part of glibc. Is there a patch for dpkg that I need?
>
> Er. I should probably put it up, shouldn't I? Fixed, and linked from
> http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/
I'm having trouble reading
http://debian-bsd.lightbearer.com/Debian-NetBSD/patches/dpkg
Is the patch elsewhere?
Does bsd libc include an obstack equivalent?
Matt Rose (not waving but drowning)
Reply to: