On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 10:49:42PM +0100, Michael Ritzert wrote: > Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org> schrieb am 02.12.03 21:51:20: > > > > I've been contacted by a member of the NetBSD team, who expressed that the > > general opinion seems to be that "Debian GNU/KNetBSD" is a better name for > > the port than "Debian GNU/NetBSD", both because it is more specific about > > If the NetBSD people are concerned about that, why should we not help them? My impression is that 'concerned' might be a bit of an overstatement. It seems more like someone saw 'GNU/KNetBSD', and said "Hey, that actually seems like it might be a better way to describe it". However, since I don't want to cause drastic confusion or simply co-opt the name Robert has been using (and since, as noted in the origional message, it's not quite as accurate for the work others are doing), I wanted to raise the issue to the Debian BSD list at large. -- Joel Baker <fenton@debian.org> ,''`. Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter : :' : `. `' `-
Attachment:
pgpuky_WdMTfg.pgp
Description: PGP signature