Re: Development Summary?
Matthew Garrett wrote:
Other than the infrastructural work, the most useful thing that could be
done would probably be to port Busybox to NetBSD. Busybox is heavily
used by debian-installer, and is the main sticking point before any sort
of proper installer can be dealt with. It's also a good project to work
on because it doesn't actually require a Debian system to work on it -
simply working on it under NetBSD is sufficient.
Well, I'll see what I can do. :-)
Whats with other non-lib-work? Maybe theres some other work on smaller
things which can be solved by somebody reading this list.