[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

re: ed package

   > On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 utsl@quic.net wrote:
   > > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad
   > > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm thinking about
   > > packaging libiberty, and
   > Also a BSD-licensed getopt (and getopt_long) is available in the NetBSD
   > libc.
   But behaves differently to GNU getopt_long, as regards its handling of
   the arguments '-' and '--'

it does?  this sounds like a bug.  it should be compatible.


Reply to: