Re: ed package
"Jeremy C. Reed" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 email@example.com wrote:
> > getopt is in libiberty. It's also in glibc, and people have a bad
> > habit of not checking for that in configure. I'm thinking about
> > packaging libiberty, and
> Also a BSD-licensed getopt (and getopt_long) is available in the NetBSD
But behaves differently to GNU getopt_long, as regards its handling of
the arguments '-' and '--'
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."