Re: Hmm

To: debian-bsd@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Hmm
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Sat, 7 Jul 2001 23:47:01 +0100
Message-id: <20010707234701.A31744@srcf.ucam.org>
In-reply-to: <20010707152323.A72769@moe.htfdw1.ct.home.com>; from bugg@sometvshow.com on Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 03:23:23PM -0400
References: <001901c106fe$6029da60$0301a8c0@lexus> <20010707183257.A512@aon.at> <20010707152323.A72769@moe.htfdw1.ct.home.com>

On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 03:23:23PM -0400, Dan Papasian wrote:

> We know it isn't Linux.  Would it be GNU tools?  dpkg/apt?

Going by the example of Debian GNU/Hurd, Debian GNU/NetBSD would be a 
NetBSD kernel with a GNU userland conforming to Debian policy. For sanity 
reasons, it should probably be as close to Debian GNU/Linux as possible 
which probably involves using existing packages (recompiled) whereever 
possible rather than starting from scratch.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

Reply to:

References:
- Hmm
  - From: "Ian Miller" <ian.miller@wiliam.com.au>
- Re: Hmm
  - From: Andreas Krennmair <a.krennmair@aon.at>
- Re: Hmm
  - From: Dan Papasian <bugg@sometvshow.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Hmm
Next by Date: NetBSD packages
Previous by thread: Re: Hmm
Next by thread: Re: Hmm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread