On Wed, Nov 15, 2000 at 09:12:28AM +0200, Moshe Zadka wrote: > On Tue, 14 Nov 2000, John Galt wrote: > > > <hammer> What kernel should we aim for first? </hammer> > > netbsd? > > This would give us so many platforms, it would simply hurt. I agree. NetBSD's platform support rules. FreeBSD is very limited. OpenBSD has almost the same platform support as Debian, so we could choose between: NetBSD - more platforms then we currently have OpenBSD - almost the same number of platforms we currently have, more secure FreeBSD - much less than the number of platforms we currently have -- _ _ _| _ _ | _ . _ | _ http://ukug.uk.freebsd.org/~claviola/key.txt (_(_|| |(_)_) |(_|\/|(_)|(_| uin#: 55799523 (icq) Linux: the choice of a GNU generation - Registered Linux User #103594 I tried the clone syscall on me, but it didn't work. -- Mike Neuffer trying to fix a serious time problem
Attachment:
pgp9xY69NyuJ2.pgp
Description: PGP signature