Re: My ideas

[John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>]

The first kernel we work on should be net. My vote in the Condorcet way
would be:

[2] net
[4] open
[3] free
[1] further discussion

Mostly because of the fact that the question is worded weird.  The
question should be:

What kernel should we, the Debian/BSD team, focus on first

[ ] netbsd
[ ] freebsd
[ ] openbsd
[ ] further discussion (we gotta have it wartan...)

There is nothing stopping us from porting all three *BSD kernels to the
Debian way, the issue is where do we start?

On Sat, 21 Oct 2000, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:

> 
> On 20-Oct-2000 prasad gadgil wrote:
> > Points to discuss can be -:
> 
> Ok, it looks like a convinient poll :)
> 
> If everybody will be agreed, we may start voting with such questions.
> But, please, no dicussions ;-)
> 
> > 
> > 1. kernel from...
> >          _Freebsd_   OR   _Net/Openbsd_
> 
> Here I can't stand ;-) Once we will port to FreeBSD which is 
> the most improved kernel for now, we may much easier create specialized 
> distros based on other kernels for other needs. For example, "Secure Debian"
>  and "Of course, it runs Debian/NetBSD" ;-)
> 
> ----------------------------------
> E-Mail: Wartan Hachaturow <wart@softhome.net>
> Date: 21-Oct-2000
> Time: 16:42:17
> 
> 
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bsd-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 

You have paid nothing for the preceding, therefore it's worth every penny
you've paid for it: if you did pay for it, might I remind you of the
immortal words of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money?

Who is John Galt?  galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!