Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?
Hi Cyril,
On Sun, May 25, 2025 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Guido Günther <agx@sigxcpu.org> (2025-05-25):
> > thanks for adding me in the loop.
>
> (Sorry for getting confused by the multiple Guido, would have done on my
> own otherwise.)
>
> > As noted in the above merge request I wasn't aware there's a necessity
> > to raise it on the list. I would have hoped that opening an issue in
> > gitlab is sufficient as the repository looked active.
>
> (Understood, see my other reply.)
>
> > Same here. I understand that it's late in the cycle but then the
> > recent feedback in the MR asking for addition to the Trixie TODO list
> > made me believe there's nothing else to do for the moment.
>
> Just to confirm, you consider the current state of the MR to be
> production ready, and don't anticipate having to tweaks things up
> afterwards, be it in tasksel or in the set of packages that's getting
> pulled by the prospective task?
We've been using that package set since some time so I sure hope it's
o.k. I just pushed a minor change to use phrog instead phog as we
dropped the later (sine phrog provides phog this is mostly cosmetic).
Thanks for considering the MR!
-- Guido
>
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/>
> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Reply to: