[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Are follow-up steps for Lomiri desktop required?



Hi,

Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> (2024-05-22):
> In d-i, pkgsel starts tasksel, so if that's available in tasksel…

so we're one year later, there was quite some traffic on the MR, but
nobody seems to have requested merging this as it is, confirming it's
in a suitable enough state to get published to the masses:

  https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/merge_requests/30

Similar story on the Phosh thing, which was never even mentioned on this
list:

  https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/tasksel/-/merge_requests/29

If we were much earlier in the release cycle, we could consider “work
in progress” quality tasks, but we're near the end, we would add to
introduce new binary packages (which per freeze policy was already
forbidden since the previous step), so I'm tempted to call all of this
too late.

Unless someone strongly feels differently, and convinces me to rethink
this, I'll drop both entries from the wishlist for Trixie.


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: