Your message dated Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:22:25 -0500 with message-id <87wnkm7wha.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net> and subject line Re: Bug#646699: btrfs: Installer offers BTRFS an optional filesystem has caused the Debian Bug report #646699, regarding Please make partman-btrfs optional as BTRFS is too unstable to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 646699: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646699 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: btrfs: Installer offers BTRFS an optional filesystem
- From: Maarten <mvrossen@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 12:48:26 +0200
- Message-id: <20111026104826.7191.98368.reportbug@super>
Package: btrfs Severity: critical Justification: causes serious data loss BTRFS shouldn't be offert as a option filesystem in the debian installer. It is unsafe to use. Quallity is poor. No recovery possible on filesystem errors. (The btrfs driver will even crash on a filesystem error) The provided tool btrfsck doesn't actually do anything. There doesn't seem to be any progres on a working btrfsck. Atleased users should be warned to not use it, unless they don't care about dataloss -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Gaudenz Steinlin <gaudenz@debian.org>, 646699-close@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Maarten <mvrossen@gmail.com>
- Subject: Re: Bug#646699: btrfs: Installer offers BTRFS an optional filesystem
- From: Nicholas D Steeves <sten@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 2021 12:22:25 -0500
- Message-id: <87wnkm7wha.fsf@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net>
- In-reply-to: <20200422230630.GA20992@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net>
- References: <20111026104826.7191.98368.reportbug@super> <87fwig3pnr.fsf@algernon.balabit> <20111026175133.GM3736@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <87ipnadeqi.fsf@meteor.durcheinandertal.local.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20200422230630.GA20992@DigitalMercury.dynalias.net>
Version: 54 Closing this decade old bug, which is no longer relevant. IMHO btrfs has been usable since partman-btrfs 35, and 54 shipped with bullseye, which uses linux 5.10. Don't forget that Fedora default installations have used btrfs since Fedora 33 (linux 5.9). Btrfs on 32bit systems is something else, but this bug report is for amd64. Best, NicholasAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---