Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?

To: jwilliamcampbell@comcast.net
Cc: debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@iijmio-mail.jp>
Date: Sun, 5 Sep 2021 08:47:40 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20210905084740.539a7abe71a66f4732a1820b@iijmio-mail.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] b5d4b9a7-f8c6-52d9-a95a-6fceb2b93d17@comcast.net>
References: <20210807224044.1f814c869fc9962dd6568b43@iijmio-mail.jp> <2DB113DF-51CA-48AD-8B78-0A698CB6112F@physik.fu-berlin.de> <3ac67d8c30275dd513d38533f9439b3f368da8bb.camel@decadent.org.uk> <[🔎] 20210905053251.89f2cf65ebde39230d442e46@iijmio-mail.jp> <[🔎] cd7cbd7d-20a1-166b-743f-64b6af042f08@physik.fu-berlin.de> <[🔎] b5d4b9a7-f8c6-52d9-a95a-6fceb2b93d17@comcast.net>

On Sat, 4 Sep 2021 14:00:06 -0700
"J. William Campbell" <jwilliamcampbell@comcast.net> wrote:
> but if we are talking about a 
> /boot partition, there is no good reason to change it to ext4.

 Ext4 is reliable than ext2, I guess. And, /boot needs it.
 

-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
  - From: "J. William Campbell" <jwilliamcampbell@comcast.net>

References:
- Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
  - From: Hideki Yamane <henrich@iijmio-mail.jp>
- Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
  - From: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de>
- Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
  - From: "J. William Campbell" <jwilliamcampbell@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
Next by Date: Bug#993668: CUPS is missing after a default GNOME Desktop Install
Previous by thread: Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
Next by thread: Re: Should /boot be ext2, instead of ext4?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread