[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#972076: marked as done (tasksel suggests the use of mktemp instead of tempfile)



Control: clone -1 -2
Control: retitle -2 tasksel --new-install fails
Control: severity -2 normal

Hi,

On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 10:21:29AM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> Swen Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> wrote:
> > On 2020-11-17 23:00 +0100, nicoo wrote:
> > > Could you confirm that the version Holdger uploaded fixes the issue?
> > Sure it does. :-)
> > 
> > > If it doesn't, please remove the “fixed in v3.60” tag I just added.
> > On the contrary, I am closing the bug hereby, no idea why Holger did not
> > do so with the upload.
> 
> Because there is - strictly spoken - one aspect of the bug, which is not yet
> fixed. That is:
>
> Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 06:43:05 +0200
> From: Markus Steinko <steinko@gmail.com>
> To: 972076@bugs.debian.org
> Subject: Bug#972076: tasksel --new-install
> 
> 
> When rechecking for the warning I figured out that `tasksel 
> --new-install` also gives an error.

Oh, apologies for missing that part.

> I'm not sure if this is because of 
> already having all needed and available packages that option offers 
> installed, or if it maybe is another bug.

Sounds like another bug, but I'll try to reproduce with the new tasksel.

> You can - of course - say, that is another issue, and thus #972076 can be
> closed, but then the other issue should get a separate bugreport.

Agreed, cloning this report as I do not see a separate one in the BTS yet.


Best,

  nicoo

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: