Bug#972076: marked as done (tasksel suggests the use of mktemp instead of tempfile)
Hi,
"Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> wrote:
> On 2020-11-17 23:00 +0100, nicoo wrote:
>
> > Control: fixed -1 3.60
> >
> > Hi Sven,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 08:14:56PM +0100, Holger Wansing wrote:
> >> Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> wrote:
> >> > tasksel builds fine with Sven's "tempfile -> mktemp" patch applied, so any
> >> > objections against this?
> >>
> >> Just pushed.
> >
> > Could you confirm that the version Holdger uploaded fixes the issue?
>
> Sure it does. :-)
>
> > If it doesn't, please remove the “fixed in v3.60” tag I just added.
>
> On the contrary, I am closing the bug hereby, no idea why Holger did not
> do so with the upload.
Because there is - strictly spoken - one aspect of the bug, which is not yet
fixed. That is:
---snip-------
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 06:43:05 +0200
From: Markus Steinko <steinko@gmail.com>
To: 972076@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#972076: tasksel --new-install
When rechecking for the warning I figured out that `tasksel
--new-install` also gives an error. I'm not sure if this is because of
already having all needed and available packages that option offers
installed, or if it maybe is another bug.
sudo tasksel --new-install
Invalid entry length (16). Fixed up to 11.
Invalid entry length (16). Fixed up to 11.
Invalid entry length (16). Fixed up to 11.
WARNING: tempfile is deprecated; consider using mktemp instead.
tasksel: Aptitude fehlgeschlagen (100)
---snap-------
You can - of course - say, that is another issue, and thus #972076 can be closed,
but then the other issue should get a separate bugreport.
Holger
--
Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Reply to: