[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: New udeb for libacl and acl? (was Re: Bug#949712: please provide an udeb to be used by rsync-udeb)



Hello,

Guillem Jover <guillem@debian.org> (2020-01-26):
> On Thu, 2020-01-23 at 22:33:52 +0000, Samuel Henrique wrote:
> > Package: libacl1
> > Version: 2.2.53-5
> > Severity: wishlist
> 
> > Hello Maintainer, as per requested in #729069 (rsync package)
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729069
> > 
> > I would like to provide an udeb for rsync, It seems that the only thing
> > missing is to have libacl1-udeb available.
> > 
> > Could you please provide an udeb for the package?
> 
> As was mentioned in debian-devel, this usually needs an ACK from the
> d-i team (CCed).

Thanks for looping us in.

> I'm also not sure whether it would make sense to add also an acl-udeb
> binary package, which would match for example the attr-udeb one.

Does rsync really depend on libacl in the first place? I'm seeing
--disable-acl-support in its configure.ac; I haven't had to toy with
rsync in rescue mode just yet, so I'm not sure how imperative it would
be to have ACL support there…

(I don't mind the acl udeb addition anyway, just putting some
ideas/options on the table.)


Cheers,
-- 
Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org)            <https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: