Hi kibi, On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:24:19 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm also immensely grateful for all the security-related work Matthew > Garrett puts everywhere he goes, but I'm not sure that MR qualifies as > “requested by d-i [0]” as you mentioned in [2]. Just to state that publicly: now that you point that out, I agree with you and I'm unsure how I convinced myself otherwise through 2018. The only other related message I found is your ack of the libcryptsetup transition [0], which doesn't count either. I might have wrongly assumed that someone involved in the early discussion was a member of d-i, I dunno. Anyway in this new light the communication was indeed on the weak side from our (cryptsetup packaging team) side, apologies for the late rush and extra work. Cheers, -- Guilhem. [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2017/12/msg00231.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature