Hi, Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2019-11-30): > Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org> wrote: > > Thinking about this change a little more, even if we were to publish D-I > > Bullseye Alpha 1 right now, which will be tested to be working… I think > > once ftp-masters update their overrides, this will break the published > > Alpha immediately. > > > > Instead of rushing a change right now (it's been months without a > > release already), I think I'll ask them to postpone updating their > > overrides until we're up for an Alpha 2. Which means we'll have a clear > > breakage at the timing of our choosing, a way to double check the > > effects of the bug, and to ensure proposed patches do the work > > appropriately, instead of implementing things blindly in a hurry, right > > now. > > Maybe, it would be the better way to force installation of tasksel in the > installer (because we need it there), instead of relying on other things > (package dependencies, which may change over time)? That's the plan, yes. Just not for the first alpha. (I don't think I mentioned dependencies, but you might have thought priorities anyway? ;)) > Means something like adding a postinst hook script in pkgsel... I didn't dive into it yet, but out of the blue, that looks like a good place to start from, indeed. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature