Holger Wansing <hwansing@mailbox.org> (2019-11-01): > Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 11:52:22PM +0200, Holger Wansing wrote: > > > > > tasksel is currently at Priority: important and thus installed in every > > > > > installation, including chroots installed via debootstrap. It doesn't > > > > > seem a useful package to install in chroots though. > > > > > > > > > > It would be nice if d-i would install tasksel (and maybe remove it at > > > > > the end of the installation again?) so the priority of the tasksel and > > > > > tasksel-data packages could be downgraded. > > > > I think that's indeed a fair topic for the buster release cycle. > > > Should we downgrade tasksel to something like optional now? > > > > now indeed seems to be a good moment for this. (and I'd appreciate this > > change for the reasons Ansgar pointed out.) > > Just committed, thanks. AFAICT from reading the bug log, it seems the part where the priority is downgraded was implemented. But was there any modifications to ensure that d-i would still install it, so that pkgsel can run tasksel? Or was such modifications not needed at all? Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature