Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org> (2019-04-22): > heh. what was the reason haveged was choosen and not > jitterentropy-rngd which was also suggested here? I have enough things to keep me busy; if the first one I look at can be turned into something useful in d-i, seems to have reasonable integration and maintenance costs, and has a maintainer who is happy to let me modify the packaging accordingly, then it's unlikely I'll spend more time looking at an alternative. Not that I wouldn't appreciate such a comparison in theory; in practice, time is limited. If others want to compare both, feel free to. Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature