Hi Andreas, Andreas B. Mundt <andi@debian.org> (2018-06-22): > Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. I worked out a minimal > patch that fixes the issue. From a quick look, that should be fine; feel free to push (with a changelog entry), thanks! > However, it would be interesting to know why armhf uses its own > individual way, no other architecture seems to do that: > > /debian-installer$ ls -l build/config/*/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 279 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/alpha/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 430 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/amd64/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 337 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/arm64/netboot.cfg > > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 3369 Jun 21 23:13 build/config/armhf/netboot.cfg > ^^^^ > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 238 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/hppa/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 367 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/hurd-i386/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 430 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/i386/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 369 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/ia64/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 919 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/m68k/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 261 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/ppc64el/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 545 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/sparc64/netboot.cfg > -rw-r--r-- 1 ansible ansible 545 Jun 21 21:34 build/config/sparc/netboot.cfg > > Perhaps this can be unified, but I guess to do that, someone more > familiar with the build system is needed. Possibly because we used to have several flavours (mx5, armmp, etc.), until everything was moved to the top-level? See git log -M --follow for earlier filenames. I think we should merge your minimal patch right away, and maybe think about unifying as you suggested if someone has some time/interest. ;) Cheers, -- Cyril Brulebois (kibi@debian.org) <https://debamax.com/> D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature