Hi, Michael Biebl <biebl@debian.org> (2017-10-24): > It's actually smaller then the old eject-udeb as I didn't include the > gettext translations. Why? OK this was late and maybe I wasn't clear on IRC, but keeping the i18n + l10n part working is important. > But there is one complication: I noticed that eject in util-linux > currently linux only. > > If we made the udeb linux-any, how would this affect the installer? It might mean a regression on kfreebsd-* (I don't see an eject-udeb binary on hurd). I'm adding debian-bsd@ and debian-hurd@ in copy. > KiBi, is this a blocker in your opinion? While non-Linux issues aren't usually a blocker, I wouldn't welcome a gratuitous breakage there. I'll let porters comment first. The i18n/l10n part going away would be a blocker though. KiBi.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature