Re: Bug#857539: unblock: systemd/231-19
On 12/03/17 12:00, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <email@example.com> (2017-03-12):
>> On 12/03/17 10:47, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>> The current systemd in unstable (232-19) fixes a bunch of bugs, mostly in
>>> resolved (which we don't enable by default), but also in bits which do run by
>>> default. Also some testing improvements.
>>> The package has been in unstable for 10 days now without any regression
>>> reports, and of course passes upstream tests and our downstream autopkgtests.
>>> debdiff between -18 (in testing) and current -19 attached. I also put the
>>> changelog and some annotations to it below.
>> Ack from me, but needs a d-i ack. Cyril?
> Doesn't seem to touch d-i-ish things, and testing over the past few days
> showed no obvious issues with that version, so no objections.