Re: partman-auto (in)consistency
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 12:39:31AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Would anybody object to me going through and switching: the lower
>> limit to 100% for all recipes? That'll give a default swap size that
>> at least looks more sensible for modern machines! The change to 96
>> here was back in 2006...
>
>Your approach seems reasonable to me, thanks.
Cool. I've just pushed that to git now.
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK. steve@einval.com
Can't keep my eyes from the circling sky,
Tongue-tied & twisted, Just an earth-bound misfit, I...
Reply to: