[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: partman-auto (in)consistency



Hi,

Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> (2016-05-01):
> I'm debugging an oddity in auto-partitioning with a friend, and we've
> found some odd inconsistencies in the partman-auto recipes in terms of
> swap space calculation. In *some* cases, swap size is set up as:
> 
>   96 512 200% linux-swap
> 
>   (see recipes/home)
> 
> but in others it's the much more sensible-looking
> 
>   100% 512 200% linux-swap
> 
>   (see recipes-amd64-efi/atomic)
> 
> Would anybody object to me going through and switching: the lower
> limit to 100% for all recipes? That'll give a default swap size that
> at least looks more sensible for modern machines! The change to 96
> here was back in 2006...

Your approach seems reasonable to me, thanks.


KiBi.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: