Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2016 03:00:05 +0100 with message-id <20161120020005.GA14201@mraw.org> and subject line Re: Bug#808874: debian-installer: FTBFS on i386: 586 vs. 686 has caused the Debian Bug report #808874, regarding debian-installer: FTBFS on i386: 586 vs. 686 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 808874: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808874 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debian-installer: FTBFS on i386: 586 vs. 686
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 00:23:11 +0100
- Message-id: <20151223232311.27792.63312.reportbug@chloe>
Source: debian-installer Severity: serious Justification: FTBFS Hi, linux received this change a while ago, and it has now reached unstable and testing: | linux (4.3~rc3-1~exp1) experimental; urgency=medium | | […] | * [i386] Replace 586 flavour with 686 | - Enable support for OLPC and other Geode-based systems in the 686 flavour | - udeb: Update kernel-versions | | -- Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Sun, 27 Sep 2015 21:02:54 +0100 so d-i no longer builds on i386. A few packages have to be tweaked for this kind of changes; I'm x-d-cc-ing the kernel team as Ben did most of the work past time. Mraw, KiBi.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk>, 808874-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>, debian-cd@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#808874: debian-installer: FTBFS on i386: 586 vs. 686
- From: Cyril Brulebois <kibi@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 03:00:05 +0100
- Message-id: <20161120020005.GA14201@mraw.org>
- In-reply-to: <1456061612.27136.21.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
- References: <20151223232311.27792.63312.reportbug@chloe> <1450923450.23005.13.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20151224023043.GF1555@mraw.org> <1450996271.6359.1.camel@decadent.org.uk> <20151225175510.GG1555@mraw.org> <1456061612.27136.21.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
Version: 20160101 Adam D. Barratt <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> (2016-02-21): > It looks like the 20160101 upload included relevant changes, and built > happily on i386. Is there anything remaining to fix? In the “better late than never” category: I think we're all set. (I had forgotten I uploaded that on Jan 01… :D) KiBi.Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---