Hi, On 05/31/2016 09:01 PM, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > I find logic in s390-netdevice. The priority of many questions is too > high, thus e.g. if one uses qeth port 0, one has to explicitely > preseed that, even though a common case qeth port 0 will work in > majority (sensible default) cases. I downgraded it from critical to medium. It was only recently added anyway. > Looking at the code it is impossible to configure IUCV. And there is > nothing to do in case of virtio. I think no questions should be even > asked if there are no CTC/QETH cards to activate. And be optional > similarly to how you propose in your patch. Can you clarify your first sentence? Should IUCV support be removed? It's unfortunate that your last patch of exiting when no CTC/QETH devices are present only went to the BTS and hence I never saw it. It would also actively break the still present IUCV support, hence I actually need some input as to why you think it's broken. And possibly a way of checking if there actually is a possibility of using IUCV for the VM in question. Kind regards and thanks Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature