On Mon, 2016-02-15 at 01:13 +0900, Roger Shimizu wrote: > [remove CC 814027@bugs.debian.org due to my post has nothing to do with gnupg] > > Dear Martin, > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 4:36 AM, Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com> wrote: > > * Roger Shimizu <rogershimizu@gmail.com> [2016-02-11 00:12]: > > > As you may already know, "ts209" d-i image failed to build due to > > > size, since two day ago. > > > It was OK on Feb. 6th [0], but got failed since Feb. 7th [1]. > > > > gpgv-udeb is now provided by gnupg2 rather than gnupg 1.4 and this > > brought in a number of new dependencies, in particular libgcrypt20 > > which is huge. I filed #814027 but I'm not sure how realistic it is > > that this change will be reverted. > > > > Since GnuPG is only used for verification, I wonder if there's a > > smaller tool that only does signature verification but I don't know. > > > > If we find no solution, I'll see if I can provide unofficial images > > with the old gpgv-udeb. > > Thanks for the info! > > I tried to hack debian-installer, and split orion5x flavour into > orion5x and orion5x-qnap. > For orion5x-qnap, I removed a few qnap unused stuff in "pkg-lists" folder. > I pushed my change to branch "split_orion5x" > - https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/log/?h=split_orion5x [...] I was looking at combining the kirkwood and orion5x flavours, matching the kernel. Should I not do that? Or is it OK to have a combined flavour for everything but those old QNAP devices? For now, I pushed my change to the benh/armel-marvell branch. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part