[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#797095: marked as done (amd64: netboot 2015-04-22, 2015-06-04, 2015-08-13 fail, wheezy succeeds)



Your message dated Tue, 06 Oct 2015 01:50:02 +0200
with message-id <56130CAA.9080401@debian.org>
and subject line Re: amd64: netboot 2015-04-22, 2015-06-04, 2015-08-13 fail, wheezy succeeds
has caused the Debian Bug report #797095,
regarding amd64: netboot 2015-04-22, 2015-06-04, 2015-08-13 fail, wheezy succeeds
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
797095: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797095
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20150422+deb8u1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable

Dear Maintainer,

summary
-------
amd64 netboot wheezy  2015-01-05 works
amd64 netboot jessie  2015-04-22 fails
amd64 netboot jessie  2015-06-04 fails
amd64 netboot stretch 2015-08-13 fails

details
-------
Have a 40-node cluster.

Started With wheezy: Head node + 2 compute nodes up
  compute nodes installed via dhcp and tftp from wheezy netboot

Upgraded head node and compute nodes, each separately, to jessie

Trying to install another compute node via dhcp, tftp, and netboot
(Using the same framework on head that worked for wheezy)

using netboot  2015-08-13 - something creates a reboot loop
syslog on head shows

==== (start) syslog ============
Aug 27 14:29:09 geodyncomp2 in.tftpd[26229]: RRQ from 10.2.81.13 filename
  pxelinux.0
Aug 27 14:29:09 geodyncomp2 in.tftpd[26229]: tftp: client does not accept options
Aug 27 14:29:09 geodyncomp2 in.tftpd[26230]: RRQ from 10.2.81.13 filename
  pxelinux.0
Aug 27 14:30:51 geodyncomp2 dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:30:48:f6:d4:6c via eth0
Aug 27 14:30:51 geodyncomp2 dhcpd: unexpected ICMP Echo Reply from 10.2.80.237
Aug 27 14:30:51 geodyncomp2 dhcpd: unexpected ICMP Echo Reply from 10.2.80.237
Aug 27 14:30:52 geodyncomp2 dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.2.81.13 to 00:30:48:f6:d4:6c
  via eth0
Aug 27 14:30:59 geodyncomp2 dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.2.81.13 (10.2.81.1)
  from 00:30:48:f6:d4:6c via eth0
Aug 27 14:30:59 geodyncomp2 dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.2.81.13 to 00:30:48:f6:d4:6c
  via eth0
...the reset happens here...or the bios retries...or something
Aug 27 14:30:59 geodyncomp2 in.tftpd[26691]: RRQ from 10.2.81.13 filename
  pxelinux.0
Aug 27 14:30:59 geodyncomp2 in.tftpd[26691]: tftp: client does not accept options
Aug 27 14:30:59 geodyncomp2 in.tftpd[26692]: RRQ from 10.2.81.13 filename
  pxelinux.0
==== (end) syslog =====================

netboot 2015-06-04 fails with different results (yes, I can provide details)

netboot 2015-04-22 fails with different results (yes, I can provide details)

netboot 2015-01-05, wheezy, works

The version is reported as 20150422+deb8u1, which I believe is dated 2015-06-04.

My system is jessie.
Not knowing how to change sources.list to just get that one package from stretch,
I downloaded the netboot images.
-rw-r--r-- 1 <cut> 19368308 Aug 27 01:33 netboot_jessie_2015-04-22.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 <cut> 38576779 Aug 27 09:28 netboot_jessie_2015-06-04_gtk.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 <cut> 19370121 Aug 27 09:26 netboot_jessie_2015-06-04.tar.gz
-rw-r--r-- 1 <cut> 21360976 Aug 27 14:21 netboot_stretch_2015-08-13.tar.gz

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.1
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

-- no debconf information

Thank you,
Dogulas.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 6 Sep 2015 14:43:25 -0300 Douglas Guptill
<douglas.guptill@dal.ca> wrote:
> Wrong.  my bad.  no bug.

> Using a 'default' file written according to the specs for syslinux
> version 6.03, I get an automated, unattended, preseeded install.
> 
> Sorry for the noise.

OK, closing the bug.


Andreas

--- End Message ---

Reply to: