Hello all, Cyril Brulebois [2015-04-17 14:15 +0200]: > I tried to follow the code path in Ubuntu, which offers this option, to > track down where the offset can come from; and see whether Debian was > affected. I didn't mean to imply that Debian proposes the same option, > as it does not. Ah ok, that explains the confusion. So let's fix ecryptfs in a post-release update, I'll file a bug with the references and explanations. > systemd | 215-16 | testing > systemd | 215-16 | unstable -17 uploaded with the originally attached patch. The only difference is the s/UNRELEASED/unstable/ and the timestamp in the changelog. Thanks, and sorry for the late timing again! Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature